well, usually the justification for this sort of thing is that they're pointing out security flaws so that those flaws can be fixed (ie. full disclosure) but this time the researcher is quite clear about the fact that there is no security flaw involved...
on the plus side, at least she has no intentions of making it available for download...
also, the 100% undetectable claim is almost certainly false - it would imply that the malware has perfect protection from malware detectors, which violates a fundamental principle that there is no perfect protection...
1 comment:
well, usually the justification for this sort of thing is that they're pointing out security flaws so that those flaws can be fixed (ie. full disclosure) but this time the researcher is quite clear about the fact that there is no security flaw involved...
on the plus side, at least she has no intentions of making it available for download...
also, the 100% undetectable claim is almost certainly false - it would imply that the malware has perfect protection from malware detectors, which violates a fundamental principle that there is no perfect protection...
Post a Comment